Home Blog Page 47

AFRICA @ 60 YEARS: HERE IS WHY THE BLACK CONTINENT WOULD VOTE FOR RE-COLONIALIZATION (Part III)

0

When Whites in South Africa imprisoned Nelson Mandela

OPINION BY:
BRIAN MUKALAZI
bmukalazi@ecmafrica.org

RECENTLY, i had a conversation with a colleague who controversially intimated that if, by any chance, a vote or referendum was to be held today regarding whether Africa should be re-colonialized or not, we would be shocked with the results.
According to him, majority of the African people would vote in favour of re-colonization. Why? Because our so-called post-colonial African liberators have failed to live up to their expectations.
They have backtracked on their promises and many no longer qualify to be labelled as heroes. Some have actually turned out to be just as brutal (or even worse) as the repressive colonial regimes they deposed.
Perhaps this could explain why in the 2016 Local Government Elections in South Africa, Athol Trollip, a white man from the predominantly ‘White’ Democratic Alliance Party, was elected mayor for the Nelson Mandela Bay Metropolitan Municipality. Trollip’s election was seen as a major political shock in South Africa.

With a Black South African population exceeding 60 per cent, the Nelson Mandela Bay has a rich history of anti-apartheid struggle and was once a key battleground. But to observers, this was an indicator that people were losing faith in the African National Congress (ANC) as a governing party.
Let’s face it, with the current state of affairs in most African countries, even if development in countries found in the Western world was to be hypothetically frozen for 100 years, I have an absurd feeling that Africa would still not catch up.There’s something exceptional about the African continent!
In this final edition of a three-part article series regarding the above notion, I will give parting shots and also take aim at the probable way forward.
Africa is blessed, Africa is NOT cursed. Of course not. Many of Africa’s problems including poverty, diseases, and poor political leadership are not specific to only Africa. The same have been consistently experienced elsewhere including Asia, South America and some parts of Europe and North America, but this idea of a ‘curse’ never ever comes up.
In the Bible, there’s no reference to creation of a special or privileged race of people. In the book of Genesis, when the first human being is created, he is simply called Adam, which stands for ‘Human-kind’ in Hebrew.
Adam and Eve were neither White nor Black and their ethnicity is not even mentioned. And the Bible seems to stress that they are the mother and father of all nations.
Back to the so-called “Curse of Ham” (Genesis 9:18-27) we examined earlier: This Scripture has been often abused, distorted and twisted by those promoting racial prejudice. But we should clearly understand that the said curse is placed on Canaan and not on Ham.
To project the curse to all of Ham’s descendants is to misread the passage. Besides, it is also speculative to assume that the name Ham actually means “black people”.
How can Africa be cursed when it has the best weather on earth? How can Africa be cursed when it almost has the largest amounts of natural resources? And how can Africa be cursed when the African people are regarded as some of the friendliest on earth? I would consider all these to be Africa’s blessings.
But could it be that we have misused the blessings God bestowed upon us? Have these blessings created complacency? Well, I don’t know if I have the right answers to these questions but what I know, for sure, is that there’s something wrong.
Getting our priorities right, like I indicated earlier, Africa is not short of the required resources to fulfil her development agenda. However, there continues to be a prolonged development crisis.
And one of the major hindrances has been the poor policy prioritization by many African governments, where key priority areas such as healthcare, agricultural production, employment and education have been largely ignored.
Let me use my homeland, Uganda, as an example: Here, you may really wonder why the Country is investing billions of Uganda shillings into production of electric cars, including buses, yet it still imports toothpicks and match boxes; when the Members of Parliament (529 MPs) are more than the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) beds in public hospitals.Then it came to the Covid-19 fight: By August 1, the country had raised over UGX 4 trillion ($1 billion) through loans, donations and grants but remarkably, the biggest chunk of these funds never went into health interventions and no single dose of Covid-19 vaccines had been purchased (all the availed vaccines came from donations).
Instead, much of the funds were reportedly used on security, allowances and other administrative activities.
The influence of the ‘white man’ (and now China), without a doubt, the slave trade, that began in the 1400’s through its peak in the 18th century, left Africa seriously bruised.
It is estimated that 11 million people were forcibly taken into slavery and according to Professor Nathan Nunn, ‘The African countries that are the poorest today are the ones from which the most slaves were taken’.
Experts say that all of Africa’s colonial masters left behind a way of life completely decimated, a people traumatised and taught in colonial schools to loathe everything about themselves; from their skin, their languages to their customs. African economies were then crippled by structural adjustment policies of the World Bank and IMF.
An observer once noted, ‘When you take a closer look at most of the problems that Africa faces, one sees the hidden hand of colonial imperialists in one form or another. Libya, South Sudan, the scourge of Boko Haram in Nigeria, and now the so-called terror threat in Cabo Delgado Province, Northern Mozambique, all point to the scramble for the natural resources found in abundance on the continent’.
Then enter China. Through its Belt and Road Initiative, China is slowly trapping many African countries into debt. For instance, the $4 billion Addis Ababa-Djibouti Railway, financed by the Chinese, ended up costing Ethiopia nearly a quarter of its total 2016 budget. Is there light at the end of the tunnel? Yes! It is not all gloom and bloom for the African continent (Reminder: Africa is not a Country!). Despite the prevailing challenges, there are real opportunities ahead. And with success stories, such as Botswana, I have no doubt in my mind that in the decades to come, Africa can make the leap from poor to good and eventually to great.
Botswana, a predominantly tropical and landlocked country, was one of the world’s poorest countries at independence in 1966. However, because of its institutional strength and prudent policies, Botswana, today, is ranked as an upper-middle income country and regularly surpasses countries such as Italy and Spain on corruption indices. It is often talked of as the ‘African miracle’.
Our leaders must create an infrastructure that will improve people’s education, health, security and economic prospects. But most importantly, we must build sustainable governance systems because these are the fulcrum of all the other issues.
We need to put our blood, sweat and tears into things that really make a difference; not just seating and waiting for foreign assistance. The honest truth is that foreign aid and investment do not in themselves develop a country/continent; they can only help. Only those with a strong development mindset and policies can develop. Ultimately, the development of Africa is up to Africans. This message should be fully engrained in the minds of each and every African.

Also click and read this: ARE AFRICANS POOR BECAUSE OF GOD’S PLAN OR GREEDY LEADERS? (Part II)

Mr. Mukalazi is the Country Director ofEvery Child Ministries Uganda.bmukalazi@ecmafrica.org

BREAKING! JUBILATION IN RUBAGA SOUTH AS DP’S EUGENIA NASSOLO WITHDRAWS ELECTION PETITION AGAINST MP ALOYSIUS MUKASA

0

BY MOSES MUGALULA

BREAKING news coming from High Court Kampala, Princess Eugenia Nassolo who petitioned court against the election of Aloysius Talton Gold Mukasa the Rubaga South member of Parliament, has lost interest in the petition and we can authoritatively report this that, this election Petition has been withdrawn. Congratulations to the three winners; Lubaga South People, Hon. Aloysius Mukasa and our mum, Princess Eugenia Nassolo.

Court will this afternoon be moved for this petition withdrawal to go on record. We are reliably informed, Nassolo who contested on DP ticket in the January 2021 Parliamentary election has decided to withdraw the petition in the spirit of opposition, uniting Lubaga South People and to allow the elected MP serve his voters without disturbances.

This News Website which writes truth, nothing but the truth, is working on an exclusive story giving the way forward after this petition is withdrawn. Watch the space!

INSIDE STORY: THE ARREST OF PRINCESS BWANGA & WHY FIRST FAMILY INTERVENED

0

NEWS EDITOR
newseditor.info@gmail.com

YESTERDAY on Wednesday 1st September 2021, Luweero court remanded Princess Faridah Bwanga Namirembe to Kigo Prison until September 13th 2021. On Thursday last week, Bwanga was arrested in Luweero by the Head State House Anti corruption unit Col. Edith Nakalema which arrest must have caused unrest amongst members of the First Family! In this story, we strictly take you through how and why Princess Bwanga was arrested last week, how she was released and the genesis of everything. Enjoy the story.
Princess Bwanga was arrested on allegations of impersonation and tresspass, not land grabbing as lies made rounds on social media and other substandard media platforms.
She was on Friday transferred from Luweero to CPS in Kampala where she was interrogated about her State House job description. She instead reffered them to her boss, President Museveni.
Led by Mr. Nzeire who is President Museveni’s young brother, a group of members of the first family on Saturday raided Kampala Central Police Station and ordered her release with immediate effect.
Other first family members who intervened were Gen. Salim Saleh’s son and another one (names withheld) who came with Prince Kimera.
Kampala CPS had to send for the Luweero Police Station file from where she was arrested on Thursday and the OC CID came on a bodaboda to bring a file which they used to release Bwanga on police bond.
For starters, Princess Bwanga is a State House employee deployed by President Museveni on special duties and we are told she reports directly to First son Gen. Muhoozi Kainerugaba.
On many occasions, Bwanga has been cited resolving land wrangles. Sometime around 2011, President Museveni linked to His Majesty Kabaka Ronald Muwenda Mutebi II through this Princess and this news website has copies of letters from President Museveni to Kabaka having Namirembe Bwanga’s name highlighted.
In fact, she played a pivotal role in returning a bunch of Buganda Kingdom land titles.
We shall come back to this later!

DETAILS
All started with Haji Ibrahim Lumu, father-in-law to Princess Namirembe Bwanga who approached her about a one Kigaba Aloysius Bukenya whom he accuses of trespassing and grabbing his land located in Kikyuusa, Luweero.
Kigaba reached out to Haji Lumu offering to buy his land. However Lumu excused himself saying his land wasnt for sale. So, according to Haji Lumu, Kigaba chose to use force and connections to grab his land.
Lumu who was accompanied by his son Abdul Mpanga narrated to Princess Bwanga how the untouchable Kigaba was hiring goons armed with machetes to butcher innocent people working on his farm.
“Whenever they attack my people, they cut them with pangers and demolish my houses. During the recent 42 days Covid-19 lock down, he grabbed a piece of my land and built on it a two roomed house. I have reported this matter at Luweero Police Station where I have not received any help. I highly suspect that the police officers also fear him or have been compromised in a way. They just look on as him and his workers continue to terrorise people they find at my farm.” A hopeless Haji Lumu told Princess Bwanga showing her about seven police references when he reported Kigaba at police.
Lumu lodged a complain to PSU at Kireka about the conduct of Luweero Police but by the time he decided to run to Princess Bwanga, he had not been helped.
She advised him to go to Ministry of Lands Luweero zonal office at Bukalasa.
On reaching at Bukalasa, Princess Bwanga requested to meet the land Registrar and the DSS.
She asked them to bring the said land file and was shocked to discover how the white page was tempered with, white washed and the true land owner’s name fidgeted with to indicate that late Mikayiri Kalibwamu who sold this land to late Matayo Mpanga Kibimbo grand father to Haji Ibrahim Lumu was actually the owner of the land.
Lumu’s father, late Kafumbe was the heir to Matayo Mpanga Kibimbo.
Princess Bwanga who talked to us from her Makindye palace reffered to this as typical fraud since Mikayiri had sold land to Matayo Mpanga as far back as 1930 and the two are dead.
“I advised that the file be taken to Kampala to ascertain how a dead person resurrected to re-own the land he sold about 90 years ago. Bukalasa land Registrar agreed with us in the presence of Haji Lumu’s lawyers to bring the file to Kampala.” Princess Bwanga explained.
At Kampala, Mr. Karuhanga, the land commissioner advised that Lumu’s lawyer writes a letter requesting for the cancellation of the tempered with land title and reinstate the true owners.

PRINCESS BWANGA VISITS LAND IN QUESTION
From Bukalasa, Haji Lumu asked Princess Bwanga to visit the land and see with her naked eyes how Kigaba tresspassed on his land and she even talk to the victims.
In a recorded video seen by this news website, Princess Bwanga was filmed interrogating men she found cleaning the ground on Lumu’s land about who brought them there.
Some said they came from Kayunga, others from Lira and confessed how they were brought by Kigaba during Covid 19 to clear this land ground.

KIGABA’S GOONS ATTACK PRINCESS BWANGA
As Princess Bwanga and team were leaving, a group of men holding big sticks and machetes surrounded them ready to pounce on her. God is good, her police guards intercepted them and managed to arrest about nine of the attackers.
They were brought to Luweero Police Station where a lady officer Nalwoga said to be the RPC opted to keep out of this case fearing for her safety.
Princess Bwanga assured her how she was safe only that her guards had arrested a group of youth who wanted her dead!
We were told, madam RPC’s response shocked the complainants.
She said, “You guys this time I am going to arrest you. I told you to back off from attacking people but you don’t listen. Today I give up on you.”
She referred them to the OC CID saying for her, she had no time for that.
OC CID detained the suspects and one of the police officers guarding Bwanga, made a police statement to show how they arrested them.
The next day, to every one’s shock police released the suspects.

HOW LUWEERO POLICE ARRESTED PRINCESS BWANGA
On day two after she left Luweero, Princess Bwanga was summoned to Luweero Police on the pretext that they were going for a locus visit on the land from where her guards arrested men who attacked her.
RPC Nalwoga ordered Bwanga to identify herself and before she said a word, DPC was directed to arrest Princess on charges of impersonation and tresspassing.
She was arrested alongside her drivers and two of her aides.
That evening, she recalls, a drone car came to pick her but she refused being moved that late.

NAKALEMA CITED
On Friday morning, a forest of police officers from Kampala was sent by Nakalema to pick her from Luweero.
Her police guards came following their boss.
She was driven direct to CPS to record another statement.
At CPS, she refused to reveal her State House job description and referred them to the appointing authority, the Head of State.
She was made to sleep in the cells of CPS on Friday. She was released on Saturday.

MORE FACTS ABOUT THE LUWEERO LAND
After buying about 304 acres from Mikayiri Kalibwami in 1930s, Matayo Mpaga Kibimbo distributed it amongst his children leaving out 62 acres for himself and his successors.
Each of his three girls got land. Luci Mwenyango got 69.60 acres, Esteri Nambi got 20 which is Block 488 plot 8 and Lukia Bansuna got 70 acres. Plot 11 is the land for Bansuna and Mwenyango.
About 80 acres are said tp be occupied by a one Ssalongo and Haji Lumu is not aware how this one came to own part of their Land.
Lumu got letters of adminstration for his two aunties, Lukia Bansuna and Luci Mwenyango.
The original plot 9 became plot 10 which is the land for successors.

ALOYSIUS KIGABA
Aloysius Bukenya Kigaba owns land near Haji Lumu’s land. Kigaba took over his grand father Nkwanga’s land on plot 5.
On 30th September 2019, Musan Associates wrote to the The Registrar Bukalasa, Luweero Lands introducing Mr. Lumu Ibrahim as the Administrator of the Estate of Lukia Bansuna, Lusi Mwenyango and Esteri Nambi of Kaswa Bulemeezi.
Lawyers Said, “We act for and on behalf of our client Mr. Lumu Ibrahim the administrator of the above captioned Estate with instructions, we introduce him to you.”
Letter says that Mr. Lumu is the administrator of the Estate of the Late Matayo Mpanga, whose daughters are Esteri Nambi, Lukia Bansuna and Lusi Mwenyango.
That sometimes, a one Kigaba Aloysius Bukenya approached Lumu Ibrahim and informed him about the Estate land in issue belonging to his predecessors.
That at the time having been told by Kigaba, Lumu Ibrahim made a follow up and approached the registrar in Bukalasa land office a one Koreta at the time. Our client was told that he can not be given any document for lack of authority ( Letters of Administration).
Having acquired the letters of Administration, Lumu Ibrahim went back to Bukalasa and found out that the blue pages were available, that is to say, Esteri Nambi, Lukia Bansuna and Lusi Mwenyango all being derived from the same MRV 103/12.
However, when he opted to process the titles of the same, he was told that the blue pages of Lukia Bansuna and Lucia Mwenyango were missing, and that the only one present was that of Esteri Nambi.
Mr. Lumu struggled to acquire title of the land belonging to the successor of Matayo Mpanga whereof he is the administrator vid Block 488 Plot 4 Kaswa Luweero.
We therefore request your authority to authorise Mr. Lumu Ibrahim open boundaries and acquire a survey report to allow him process for the land title belonging to the Estate which is plot 11 as the residue left. We await for your cooperation and quick response with regard to the same.
On 11th March 2020, lawyers of Musan Associates wrote to the The Commissioner Lands about the Area schedule vid 103/12 of Kaswa Bulemeezi. It was received on 12 March 2020.
The letter reads, “Reference is made to the above subject matter. We write to you with regard to the issues discussed verbally in your office with regard to the same.That you requested for an area schedule of the same so as to enable you conduct an investigation and make a bolstered decision in reference to the missing blue pages of Lukia Bansuna and Ruth Mwenyango.”
“We therefore request you through your office to respond accordingly by allowing our client process the title of the missing blue pages. Hope our request shall be put into your consideration.” Wrote Musan Associates
On 17th August 2021, Musan Associates acting on the instructions of Lumu Ibrahim the administrator of the Estate of Lukia Bunsana and Luci Mwenyango, wrote to the Registrar Bukalasa Land Office requesting for research of Block No. 488 plot 11 at Kaswa Bulemeezi in Luweero. They wanted to ascertain the status of the above captioned plot. They wanted this office to provide them with an official search letter thereafter.
On the same day, the same lawyers wrote to the Registrar Land Bukalasa, Re: Complaint on Block 488 plot 11 at Kaswa Bulemeezi in Luweero district.
We act for and on behalf of Lumu Ibrahim on whose instructions we address you as follows:
That the above captioned number is derived from MRV 299 Folio 9.
That on the 27th July 2020, a detailed area schedule was issued with information reflecting plot 11 as residue.
That it was reflected in the same area schedule that Lukia Bansuna and Luci Mwenyango are entitled to survey from plot 9, from which the residue is generated.
That Mr. Lumu is the administrator of the Estate of Matayo Mpanga, Lukia Bansuna and Luci Mwenyango.
That Mr. Lumu Ibrahim acquired title plot 10 in 2016 as the successor of Matayo Mpanga as reflected by the MRV title.
That Mr. Lumu is in the process of acquiring the title of Lukia Bansuna and Luci Mwenyango respectively.
That given the comprehensive distribution of land as indicated in the MRV, Mikali Kalibwame having been the first proprietor ceased to have part or any of the Estate whatsoever as reflected in the MRV.
That our client was surprised having been told that plot 11 as residue belongs to Mikari Kalibwame and that title to the whole residue was issued in 2018 as indicated by the district staff surveyor. Whereof, we verily believe that this was fraudulent transaction that took place without our client’s knowledge.
That when you add up the Estate of Lukia Bansuna and Luci Mwenyango, it automatically adds up to the total hectares (56.4) as indicated in the area schedule.
We therefore request for the following;
1) The permission be granted to survey the said residue conducted by a surveyor.
2) Cancellation of the title of Block 488 plot 11 that was fraudulently acquired/issued in 2018.
3) That title to the respective Estates be processed and issued to the administrator of both estates.
On 18th August 2021, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban development, Luweero Ministry Zonal office wrote to Musan Associates about statement of search of Bulemeezi Block 488 plot 11 as at 18th August 2021.
The following entries appeared on the Title register;
Title: LANDS AT KASWA BULEMEEZI BLOCK 488 PLOT 11
Area: 56.4000 hectares
Owner: Mikaeri Kalibwani of Kaswa registered on 1st October 2018 at 9:24 am under instrument no. BUK174279
Incumberance/s: None
“It is for you to satisfy yourself that this land is the property of the person whom you are interested in and not of someone else of the same name.” Wrote Jamirah Lunkuse, Registrar of Titles, for commissioner land Registration.

For views/comments on this story, sms 0792735159 or email us newseditor.info@gmail.com

ARE AFRICANS POOR BECAUSE OF GOD’S PLAN OR GREEDY LEADERS? (Part II)

0

Rich in Resources: Why is Democratic Republic of Congo Poor?

OPINION BY:
BRIAN MUKALAZI
bmukalazi@ecmafrica.org

FROM advances in technology and medicine to paradigm shifts in livelihood systems, the past 50 or so years have seen tremendous changes occur in people’s standards of living all over the world. On average, people’s lives have improved on every continent. Except for Africa! 

While Africa is often regarded as the most beautiful and richest continent, it is, at the same time, the poorest land on earth and is the only large, contiguous region left out of the worldwide rise in prosperity – with more than a quarter of the hungry in the world living on the African continent.Why is that? Is Africa really cursed? Obviously, there are myriad of issues surrounding this question. In last week’s article, titled: “Is Africa really cursed? – Part I”, I ventured into a number of potential causes for Africa’s problems and the focus was on widespread corruption, gross abuse of public resources, bad leadership and political instabilities. 
In today’s discussion, I will focus on these two underlying factors: (1) Scriptures and biblical interpretations, and (2) poverty and the mindset factor; 
Scriptures and biblical interpretations
Were Africans or black people born to be slaves? In his book, ‘The Curse of Ham”, David Goldenberg notes that there’s a myth derived from the book of Genesis in the Bible that the black race came from the lineage of Noah’s cursed son, Ham (in particular Canaan, one of his four sons), who was cursed by his drunken father. 
In the scriptures, Noah said, “Cursed be Canaan! The lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers.” He then blesses Shem and Japheth (who were the two other sons of Noah), declaring, “Blessed be the LORD of Shem! May Canaan be the slave of Shem. May God extend the territory of Japheth. . . and may Canaan be his slave” (Gen. 9:25-27). 
Although there is no biblical evidence that Ham was the “father” of African people, various Jewish, Christian and Islamic writers came to believe that he was, and this belief, in many ways, helped establish a firm connection between Ham, Africa, slavery and race. For thousands of years, this biblical story has been used as the single-greatest justification for Black segregation. This story was/is frequently cited by many White people to argue that the slavery of the black race was, in fact, a fulfilment of the prophecy. They argued that: (1) the word “Ham” means “black” and thus refers to the Black race; and (2) God commanded that the descendants of Ham (Black people) become slaves to Japheth, who, they argue (d), represents the White race. Some observers also argue that the misinterpretation and misapplication of this particular bible story was one of the roots of the deadly tribalism that destroyed lives of more than 800,000 people in Rwanda. The story became the justification for giving privileged status to one indigenous group over another.
Away from the so-called ‘curse of Ham’, there are several other holy scriptures often quoted (and misquoted) by those in support of this miserable subject, including church leaders and other Christians. 
One of those came from the Apostle Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians 6:5-8 that states, “Slaves, be obedient to your human masters with fear and trembling, in sincerity of heart, as to Christ”. 
In reference to those two scriptures above, the other parts of the Bible have been largely ignored and the promoters often point out that nowhere in the Bible did Jesus condemn slavery.  It was/is also generally accepted that the Latin word servus, usually translated as servant, really meant slave.
Poverty and the mindset factor It is ironic that, in terms of natural resources, Africa is arguably the richest continent on earth yet the majority of its population lives on the margins of society. 
For instance, with over $24 trillion in mineral deposits, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is ranked among the top 10 Countries in the world with the most natural resources. But in a rather bizarre contrast, DRC is also ranked in the top 10 list of poorest countries in the world. Today, poverty can be singled out as Africa’s biggest problem and it is even deeper than our broken political systems. 

The Poverty levels have been exacerbated by the Covid-19 pandemic and it is estimated that nearly 50 million people in sub-Saharan Africa could be pushed into extreme poverty. 
When people imagine poverty in Africa, they tend to think of it in terms of lack of means or resources, but that is not true. The real issue resides in our ‘Mindset’ – you may also call it ‘poverty of the mind’ – of its leaders and citizens. 
African People are mainly driven by dependence on government and foreign aid, instead of critical thinking, hard-work, determination and a sense of responsibility towards self & country. 
Whereas Africa is estimated to receive over $140 billion in foreign aid and donations each year, there’s overwhelming evidence to demonstrate that this aid has instead made the poor poorer, and the economic growth slower. 
Also, some $220 billion is extracted from the continent in the form of debt repayments, multinational company profits, and illicit financial flows. 
In other words, Africa suffers a net loss of more than $80 billion every year. Dambisa Moyo, a global economist and author, contends in her book, Dead Aid, that while foreign aid that addresses humanitarian needs caused by drought and conflict is helpful, most of the aid given to African countries is rather harmful. 
Moyo lists the problems enhanced by aid to include corruption, civil conflict, shrinking of the middle class, and the instilling of a culture of dependency. 
And even the would-be good poverty alleviation projects do not necessarily empower the people because they are usually compromised by the government and other officials in charge. 
These projects often turn out to be short-lived programmes that mainly benefit the government officials or a limited number of the people concerned. 
If Africa is to make any meaningful progress, the mentality of looking for solutions to come from elsewhere and blaming outsiders for our poverty and misfortunes must stop. 
The unwillingness to take action, and the deep-seated mindset problem pose some of the biggest mysteries, obstacles and threats to development in Africa.
To be continued…

Also click this story and read: ARE WE CURSED OR? HOW CIVIL WARS, BLOOD RIOTS & POLITICAL UNREST HAS CAUSED AFRICA’S SLOWED GROWTH (Part I)

The Writer Mr. Brian Mukalazi is the Country Director of Every Child Ministries Uganda. Reach him via: bmukalazi@ecmafrica.org

BARBARA NEKESA: WHAT ARE THE TASKS AHEAD AS NEW NRM PARTY TREASURER

0

Outgoing NRM Treasurer Rose Namayanja Nsereko handing over office to Barbara Nekesa (Right)

BY KETRAH JJEMBA
KAMPALA

TWO months ago, President Museveni who doubles as the Chairman of the ruling National Resistance Movement appointed new leadership at the Kyaddondo Party Headquarters in Kampala where he among others, replaced Hon. Rose Namayanja Nsereko with Hon. Barbara Nekesa Oundo as the NRM National Treasurer.
Nekesa took over office a week back at a function where newly appointed NRM Secretary General Richard Todwong promised party members that the new team at the Secretariat priorities transparency and openness while executing party activities. 
Todwong who took over from Justine Kasule Lumumba said, “We are all servants of the party. A cordial relationship and mutual understanding with one other is key. We are going to continue respecting one another but also allow offices to work independently to help achieve  the overall goal for all stakeholders”. 
For the newly elected Party Treasurer Nekesa, her tasks rotate around filing all reports and statements accurately and on time. Depositing receipts and authorizing expenditures or appointing someone else (orally or in writing) to authorize expenditures. She must be in position to look for funds that will run party offices in different districts and the activities both in districts and at the party headquarters. Here, Namayanja had weaknesses. The party Chairman expects Nekesa to be different so that all party structures function perfectly.

WHAT YOU DON’T ABOUT BARBARA NEKESA
A 37 years old Barbara Nekesa Oundo is a born of Busia District in the Eastern Uganda. She was born on 6 June 1984 to Mary Hadudu, mother and Edward Wabudi, a local councillor. This couple is blessed with 9 other girls.
Nekesa has been serving as Uganda’s High Commissioner to South Africa and was based in Pretoria.
In that capacity, she has been also representing Uganda to the nations of South Africa, Botswana, Namibia, Lesotho and Swaziland.
A graduate in Bachelors of Human Resource Management from Makerere University she got married to Charles Mukanga Oundo, a foreign service officer, whom she met while  still an undergraduate at Makerere University. The two have children. 
In 2017, she however divorced Mr. Charles Oundo her first husband. In December 2018, she entered into another marriage with Hajji Suleiman Lumolo Mafabi, a reknown businessman based in Mbale. The private ceremony took place at their home in Muyenga, an upscale neighborhood in Kampala.
Nekesa attended Bubulo Girls School in Mbale for her middle school education (O-Level) and Mbogo High School in Kawempe for her high school studies (A-Level).
​Before being appointed Uganda’s Ambassador to South Africa, Ms. Barbara Nekesa was on May 27th 2011 appointed the state minister for Karamoja affairs in the Cabinet. 
Then, she was the elected Busia District woman Member of Parliament in the 9th parliament representing ruling National Resistance Movement  (NRM).

For views/comments on this story, sms 0792735159 or email: newseditor.info@gmail.com

BANYARWANDA COMMUNITY, IMMIGRATION WAR OVER PASSPORTS DEEPENS

0

In the Photo: Frank Gashumba

BY KETRAH JJEMBA
KAMPALA

A RIFT between Banyarwanda, a community of Rwandan origin living in Uganda and the immigration offices at the Ministry of internal Affairs over passport issuance has depeened.
Their war has now reached High Court in Kampala where the principal immigration officer one Deborah  Amanya filed a case in court blocking Mr. Frank Gashumba who is the Chairperson of the council of Banyarwanda community in Uganda  blocking him from talking about  the continued discrimination of Banyarwanda at the immigration offices.
Banyarwanda accuse immigration offices for denying them passports.
For starters, Banyarwanda are named as number 24 under the tribes listed in the Constitution of The Republic of Uganda.
Speaking to the press in Kampala on Monday, Mr. Gashumba said Ms Deborah Amanya’s motive is to tight lip them so that they do not talk about the continued  discrimination of Banyarwanda at the immigration offices.
“We wonder why the Banyarwanda are so much considered as Ugandans during election time and given voter slips but later denied passports at the ministry of internal affairs. These days, export  labour companies have stoped them from applying for jobs abroad knowing that they will not be given passports. What is the motive behind this circus?” Asked Frank Gashumba who wanted the Banyarwanda community in Uganda to be given a new name of Abavandimwe.
On Monday, Frank Gashumba went to the High court expecting the matter to be heard, but unfortunately court did not sit. The High court registrar Jameson Katemsni had an engagement thus adjourning the matter up to Monday 30th August 2021.

For views/comments on this story, sms 0792735159 or email: newseditor.info@gmail.com

‘DON’T BRING HERE NEW PETITIONS’, JUDGE ORDERS NASSOLO LAWYERS IN AN ELECTION PETITION FILED AGAINST MP ALOYSIUS MUKASA

0

TODAY: Hon. Mukasa addressing journalists outside court

ANITA NAMBI 
newseditor.info@gmail.com

HIGH COURT judge Her Lordship Dr. Winfred Nabisinde has today Tuesday afternoon on condition granted an application filed in by lawyers of Ms Eugenia Nassolo to bring other affidavits supporting her election petition against Lubaga South legislator Aloysius Mukasa.
In her wise ruling, Her Lordship Dr. Nabisinde granted the petition but ordered that, new affidavits must be in line with the grounds in the petition before court not bringing something new which court will not hesitate to throw away.
She in fact reminded the petitioner and her lawyers the five grounds on which her petition is built warning that if she brings something different, it will not be put on court record.
“Make sure you file those new affidavits by today (Tuesday) evening and the respondents must be served by Friday 27th August 2021. Court is adjourned to Monday 30th August 2021 at 2pm for hearing.” Ruled Her Lordship  Dr. Nabisinde.
Shortly after adjournment of the court, this news website exclusively talked to lawyers of Yiga, Semuyaba & Co. Advocates who are representing Lubaga South legislator Aloysius Mukasa in this election petition to give us their view about the petitioner’s application which court granted today. 
Counsel Semuyaba said, they are not bothered by the petitioner’s fresh evidence provided it is in line with the petition. He welcomed the ruling and said they are ready to scrutinies every line of the affidavit.
“Our legal team is not bothered by the new affidavits. We already knew what the petitioner was cooking and we have the answers. We are ahead. Good, Monday is not too far.” Said Counsel Semuyaba.
Earlier today, Nassolo, through her lawyers of Caleb Alaka & Co. Advocates asked court to allow her file in more affidavits outside the filing time to support her petition, an application lawyers of the 1st Respondent (Aloysius Mukasa) and those of the 2nd Respondent (Electoral commission) strongly objected saying, the petitioner wants to bring in another petition something which is outside the Parliamentary election Act (amended in 2005).
The lawyers perfectly made their point citing a number of cases and on the other side, lawyers of the petitioner assured court how they will not bring in a new petition from the one before court.
Outside court room, Hon. Mukasa said he is at court to fight and protect Lubaga South win which the loser Nassolo dreams that can grab through the High Court. 
“You all know we defeated her by a margin of about 40,000 votes. Lubaga South people spoke out loudly. No one be it who will ever grab this win. We are here to demonstrate that we are the winners. She came here unprepared that is why you saw her fidgeting and asking for more time to manufacture evidence. We can give her be it a full year if she wants but at the end of it, she will lose miserably.” Said MP Aloysius Mukasa commonly known as Taata Lubaga while addressing journalists today.
For starters, through her lawyers of M/s Alaka & Co. Advocates, Eugenia Nassolo petitioned High court for a declaration that the respondent (Aloysius Mukasa) was not at the time of his nomination and election qualified to take part in the elections of member of Parliament. 
Secondly, for declaration that the 1st respondent was not validly elected as member of Parliament for Rubaga South Constituency. 
Nassolo petitioned court for declaration that she is the validly elected member of Rubaga Division South Constituency. The Petitioner also sought for an order that the election of the 1st respondent as Member of Parliament Rubaga Division South be set aside,that the petitioner is the dully elected Member of Parliament for Rubaga Division South Constituency, and that the respondents pay the costs of the petition.
Lawyers of the 1st Respondent have already vowed to ask court to properly evaluate the petitioner’s evidence on record.
They want the trial judge to subject the evidence before court to the standard of proof required in Parliamentary elections petition. 
The 1st Respondent’s counsel is expected to rely on Dr. Kizito Deo Lukyamuzi v Kasamba Mathias and Another; Election petition No. 3 of 2011 for holding that, neither the Act nor the Regulations made under it give the definition of the phrase “change of name” therefore, it is not clear whether variation in name by merely adding or abbreviating your other name, without losing or abandoning the use of the original one, amounts to change. 
On questioning MP Mukasa’s academic documents, the learned trial judge is expected to make an inquiry according to section 63 (4) of the Parliamentary Elections Act into whether the 1st Respondent actually studied from Lubiri Secondary School under his current names before reaching a conclusion that he does not have requisite academic qualifications. 
Hon. Mukasa’s counsel says, there is no iota of evidence from the two schools that the 1st Respondent was not their former student. The burden of proving that Hon. Mukasa did not posses the minimum academic documents to be nominated as a candidate for election as a member of Parliament will now shift to the petitioner Eugenia Nassolo.
Mukasa lawyers want court to appraise the evidence on vote bribery submitted by the petitioner by subjecting it to scrutiny and coming up with a decision.
A successful businessman who is among Hon. Bobi Wine’s top confidants, Hon. Aloysius Mukasa contested on opposition National Unity Platform (NUP) ticket, massively winning Nassolo Eugenia and other twelve candidates to be declared winner by The Electoral Commission Kampala Returning officer.
Other candidates were; Male Charles Kenneth (NRM), Kifampa Silaje (JEEMA), Kato Lubwama Paul (Independent), Mugga Adam Swift (Independent), Lufunya Derrick (Independent), Ken Lukyamuzi (CP), Lubega Samuel Walter Mukaaku (SDP), Buwembo Habib (FDC), Kiyingi Denis ( Independent), Nakanwagi Grace (Independent), Sebugwawo Mbidde Denis (Independent) and Kayemba Michael Oscar (Independent).
Aloysius Mukasa polled 49,501 (Forty Nine thousand, five hundred and one) and Nassolo came second 12,893 (Twelve thousand, Eight Hundred ninety three) votes.

For views/Remarks, send us an sms on 0792735159

‘U DONT HAVE BOOKS’, PANIC IN NANSANA MUNICIPALITY AS FDC INSISTS MP WAKAYIMA BE THROWN OUT

0

NEWS EDITOR
newseditor.info@gmail.com
 

IT IS not yet UHURU for Nansana Municipality Constituency Member of Parliament Wakayima Musoke Hannington Nsereko!
Opposition Forum for Democratic Change (FDC) party insists, Hight court should throw out this NUP man due to lack of minimum academic qualification and a by-election be held for the people of Nansana Municipality Constituency to elect a suitable member of Parliament. 
The same Wakayima Musoke was thrown out of the 10th Parliament due to lack of minimum academic qualification. FDC says, he should instead go back to school and aquire the required academic qualification of he is to contest for members of Parliament.

In an election petition 04 of 2021, Musoke Hamisi Walusimbi, the FDC candidate in the 14th January 2021 Nansana Municipality Member of Parliament election has told High court that, “The election of Wakayima Musoke as Member of Parliament for Nansana Municipality Constituency without having been dully nominated is null and void and ought to be set aside and a bye-election/fresh election held for the position of Member of parliament for Nansana Municipality constituency.”
FDC party is strongly backing the petitioner and prays that his petition is successful.
Though his lawyers of M/s Kabega, Bogezi & Bukenya Advocates, Musoke Hamisi Walusimbi told court that, contrary to Article 80 (1) (c) of the 1995 Constitution  (as amended) and Section 4 (1) (c) of the Parliamentary Elections Act 2005 (as amended), the 2nd Respondent (Electoral Commission) nominated the 1st Respondent (Wakayima Musoke Hannington Nsereko) while he did not possess the requisite minimum academic requirement of “A” Level formal education and such, unqualified to participate in the election for directly elected members of Parliament for Nansana Municipality or anywhere else.
A registered voter at Umea Primary School polling station, Nansana East Ward, Nansana Municipality Wakiso District and holder of National Identity Card Nin No. CM8303210262EC, Petitioner Musoke Hamisi Walusimbi says, contrary to Section 4 of the Parliamentary Elections Act 2005 (as amended), Electoral Commission accepted documents of another person as academic documents of Wakayima Musoke Hannington Nsereko.
“In the result, the Election of Wakayima Musoke as Member of Parliament for Nansana Municipality County without having been dully, lawfully and or legally nominated and without the requisite minimum academic qualifications is null and void and ought to be set aside and bye-election/fresh election held for the position of Member of Parliament for Nansana Municipality Constituency.” Reads Musoke Hamisi Walusimbi’s petition.
The petitioner was dully nominated candidate for election and such did participate in the election for Member of Parliament for Nansana Municipality Constituency as an FDC candidate together with the 1st respondent (Wakayima Musoke Honington Nsereko) an NUP candidate.
The Election was held on the 14th of January 2021 and the 1st Respondent was declared and published in the Uganda Gazette as the validly elected Members of Parliament for Nansana Municipality Constituency in Wakiso district with 67,862 votes while the petitioner (Musoke Hamisi Walusimbi) polled 744 votes.
Other contestants scored as follow; Kasule Robert Sebunya – NRM (15,367 votes), Musoke Enoch Kintu – Independent (1,761 votes) and Kaaya Rajab Semalulu -ANT (703 votes).
The petitioner contends that the above election was conducted in contravention of the provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995, The Electoral Commission Act Cap 140 and The Parliamentary Elections Act, 2005 which affected the result of the election in a substantial manner rendering the nomination, participation and declaration of Wakayima as winner of the 14th January 2021 elections irregular, illegal, unlawful and invalid or otherwise rendering the election invalid and one unable to obtain the will of the people of Nansana Municipality Constituency through a free and fair election.
The petitioner avers that the entire Electoral process in Nansana Municipality Constituency beginning with the nomination exercise was characterised by acts of non-compliance and breach of Constitutional and statutory breaches, illegalities and commission of numerous Electoral offences and illegal practices contrary to the provisions of the Parliamentary Elections Act 2005, the Electoral Commission Act Cap 140 and the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda 1995.
“In the alternative, the Electoral process, polling and subsequent election of Wakayima Musoke as a directly elected Members of Parliament for Nansana Municipality Constituency was conducted in non-compliance with the provisions of the Parliamentary Elections Act 2005 and the Electoral Commission Act, and the non-compliance and failure to observe these provisions affected the results of the elections in a substantial manner and ought to be set aside and a bye-election ordered.” Reads the petition.
The petitioner avers that Wakayima Musoke directly benefited from the above non-compliance with the provisions of the Parliamentary Elections Act, 2005 and the Electoral Commission Act.

WAKAYIMA HAS NO MINIMUM ACADEMIC QUALIFICATION – PETITIONER
In his affidavit supporting the petition, the petitioner Musoke Hamisi Walusimbi avers that, on 14th October 2020, another registered voter in Nabweru South in Nansana Municipality a one Ssemanda Umar through his lawyers of Mugarura, Kwarisiima & Co. Advocates raised a similar complaint concerning the discrepancies in the academic documents of Wakayima Musoke which complaint was ignored by Electoral Commission. The same was served on the Returning officer of Wakiso District. Surprisingly, the same was ignored.
The petitioner says,  he is aware that Wakayima Musoke presented academic documents that do not belong to him and has since made attempts to make sworn statements through statutory declarations, affidavits and has made and gazetted a deed poll to adopt the names of person(s) whose academic documents Wakayima Musoke is using/relying on which is unlawful, illegal and criminal.
“I am aware that the discrepancies are glaring and Electoral commission should not have accepted the same and should not have nominated him to run for the position of Member of Parliament not only in Nansana Municipality Constituency but also anywhere in Uganda because the legal regime does not allow him to contest for the said position while he dies not possess the necessary minimum qualifications of “A” level or its equivalent.” Said the petitioner.
He says, the academic documents and other qualification documents presented by Wakayima Musoke are questionable and can not be his in as far as;
■ The Musoke Hannington, which name Wakayima Musoke in his deed poll Gazetted on 24th of July 2020 purports to have been using, sat PLE at Nansana Catholic School under index No. 241150 035 in which he scored 8-in English, Maths 8, Science 5 and SST 6 hence aggregate of 27.
Whereas, Musoke Hannington that enrolled at Old Kampala Secondary school sat PLE at Nansana under Index No. 023 in which he scored; English 2, Maths 3, Science 1 and SST 2 and got aggregate 8. The said Musoke Hanningtons are different and Wakayima Musoke is seeking to impersonate both. The said persons and Wakayima Musoke can not be one and the same person.  
■ The afore mentioned academic documents which Wakayima Musoke presented for nomination are the same academic documents the court of Appeal as not reflect the required minimum academic qualifications.
■ The said information refers to different persons although Wakayima Musoke seeks to own and rely on the same as his own to back up claims that he possesses the necessary minimum academic qualifications.
■ The Musoke Hannington who enrolled at Old Kampala Secondary school and personally filled the Admission Form indictated his date of birth as 24th December 1974 whereas Wakayima Musoke’s National Identity card shows his date of birth as 4th April 1974. As such, the said persons can not be the one and the same person.
■ The Musoke Hanningtons who sat PLE and UCE are completely different and have never participated in Elective politics particularly in the current one for Member of Parliament for Nansana Municipality whose election was held on the 14th of January 2021.
■ Wakayima Musoke on 2006, 2011 and 2016 participating in elective politics under the guise of Musoke Nsereko Wakayima  (2006), Wakayima Musoke Nsereko (2011) and Wakayima Musoke Nsereko (2016) are not compatible with the Musoke Hanningtons that attended school, not to mention the fact of the said attending school by the Musoke Hanningtons being also questionable.
■ He was issued with a passport No.B0884011 issued on 27th July 2011 in the names of Musoke Nsereko Wakayima different from what the National ID bore being Musoke Hannington Nsereko. In 2011 and 2016 purported to use names of Wakayima Musoke Nsereko the said identities are intended to mislead and confuse public given the questionable education record of the 1st Respondent and the Musoke Hanningtons that he seeks to impersonate.
■ The Musoke Hannington who sat “A” level at Namagabi Secondary School does not have record of having studied Senior 5 and 6 anywhere and renders the academic record even of the said Musoke Hannington highly questionable.
■ On 20th July 2016 in the judgement of the High Court in Hon. Kasule Robert Sebunya Vs Wakayima Musoke Nsereko and the Electoral Commission  (Electoral Petition No. 004 of 2016) and the subsequent appeal in Wakayima Musoke Nsereko & Another Vs Kasule Robert Sebunya (Election Appeal No. 0050 & 102 of 2016), the 1st Respondent  (who then used the names of Wakayima Musoke Nsereko) was adjudged to be different from the person whose academic documents he had presented for nomination and eventual election declared a nullity.
■ That I am advised by my lawyers of Kabega, Bogezi, Bukenya & Co. Advocates which advice I believe to be true that by the virtue of the judgements of the High court and Court of Appeal, the 1st Respondent in essence was required to get to school and obtain the required minimum academic qualification to be able to participate in Elective politics for member of Parliament as opposed to publishing a deed poll to adopt names ofor other persons that may have the necessary qualifications.
■ That I am advised by my lawyers that it was grossly improper, illegal and unlawful for the 1st Respondent to have sworn a statutory declaration and published a deed poll to circumvent a Court judgement.

WHAT THE PETITIONER ASKED HIGH COURT
Your petitioner contends that, Wakayima Musoke personally and/or through his agents with his knowledge, consent or approval committed the following illegal practices and offences;
a) Used and presented to Electoral Commission for the purposes of his nomination, academic and other documents not belonging to him as his.
The petitioner contends that all the above illegal practices and offences were committed by Wakayima Musoke and/or his agents and supporters with his knowledge, consent, or approval and the first Respondent is liable for all these offences and illegal practices relating to presentation of the said academic documents.
The petitioner among others, humbly prays that it may be declared that;
(a) The nomination of Wakayima Musoke to run for the position of the directly elected Members of Parliament for Nansana Municipality was conducted contrary to the law and was a nullity.
(b) Wakayima Musoke doesn’t possess the requisite minimum academic requirements for election as member of parliament.
(c)The acts of Wakayima Musoke in swearing an affidavit, statutory declaration and deed policy to alter the judgement of the Court is illegal, unlawful and of no legal effect. 
(d) A by-election 
(e) Wakayima Musoke and Electoral Commission pay the costs of the petition.

For views/comments on this story, sms 0792735159 or email: newseditor.info@gmail.com

WHAT SPEAKER OULANYAH HAS TOLD LATE GEN. LOKECH’S WIFE

0

NEWS EDITOR 
newseditor.info@gmail.com

THE 11th Parliament Speaker Rt. Hon. Jacob Oulanyah has today evening visited the home of fallen Uganda Police Force (UPF) boss Maj. Gen Paul Lokech in Kitikifumba, Kira Municipality, Wakiso district to condole with the wife to the late.
Speaker Oulanyah encouraged the widow to, “Stay strong and be the pillar of your home. I ask you to always look up to God for guidance and strength.”
The sudden death of the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Maj Gen Paul Lokech, 55, was due to a blood clot, the Uganda Police Force has confirmed.
According a statement by the Force’s spokesperson, Mr Fred Enanga, a team of four pathologists carried out an autopsy on The Lion of Mogadishu’s body in the presence of four witnesses Brig Gen Dr Kusasira Stephen, the Director Medical Services in the UPDF, the deceased’s personal doctor, Khiingi Ben and two family representatives.

Speaker Oulanyah (putting on cap) talking to his deputy Anita Among at Lokech’s home. In the photo is Gen. Otema and Members of Parliament
At the late Lokech’s home, Speaker Oulanyah was seen with Among outside Lokech’s house sharing a moment while Gen. Otema Awany, Minister Beatrice Anywar and Members of Parliament waited on them. The Speaker  was just leaving as the Deputy Speaker came in.

HERE ARE PUBLIC RESPONSES TO PROF. KANYEIHAMBA’S VIRAL STORY ON WHY GOVERNMENT’S MOVE TO ABOLISH MAILO LAND MUST BE RESISTED

0

When President Museveni visited Lusanja where hundreds of families lost their property due to land eviction. This is not Mailo land

NEWS EDITOR
newseditor.info@gmail.com

PUBLIC has agreed with Retired Supreme Court justice Prof. George Wilson Kanyeihamba how it is suicidal for the government to abolish private Mailo land tenure system interpreting it as a launch of a fight against the Kabaka and Ugandans who pay allegiance to Buganda King.
According to hundreds of comments on Kanyeihamba’s story this news website published a week ago, we have received emails and sms showing how public wants government to stop hiding it’s head under the sand and instead address the causes of land conflicts, land grabbing and evictions which they very much know and leave Kabaka’s land alone.
Prof. Kanyeihamba who is also, 1995 Constitution draftsman had a media interview on land matters in which he strongly advised President Museveni to drop his campaign against Private Mailo land, else it will cause him problems.
The Kabaka of Buganda owns chunks of Mailo land and his subjects refer to him as Landlord.
An attempt to abolish private Mailo is seen as a plot to take away Kabaka’s land which public say, will not allow.
Justice Kanyeihamba brought it to the president how it’s dangerous and unconstitutional to abolish Mailo land tenure system which has become culture, not only of Baganda but of Uganda.
“Please president Museveni, don’t embarrass us, leave us to stay peacefully on Mailo land. We are all Kabaka’s people and we love him so much.” Said Prof. Kanyeihamba who is a tenant on Kabaka’s land in Buziga and proudly pays land rates (Busuulu) to his land lord, His Majesty Ronald Muwenda Mutebi II.
Of recent, President Museveni has been campaigning for the abolishment of Private Mailo Land tenure system saying it’s the major cause of land conflicts and he wants land to be owned by the government.
Justice Kanyeihamba who is a senior constitutional lawyer has laughed off the President saying he is just looking for what will take him out of power, let him not be misled by the corrupt who want free land, Mailo land is here to stay.
Commenting on this exclusive interview published by News Editor news Website, hundreds were positive to Kanyeihamba’s analysis. Click and read this story: ‘DROP UNPOPULAR CAMPAIGN AGAINST MAILO LAND OR IT WILL TAKE YOU OUT OF POWER’, SENIOR JUDGE WARNS MUSEVENI
The editor has picked some responses to Justice Kanyeihamba’s story. Please read on:
Fredrick Ntege (frericios@gmail.com): This was a great enlightenment of what we need to uphold as Ugandans regardless of region we originate. Because today its affecting Buganda and tomorrow it will come to haunt others. I believe Justice Kanyeihamba and many others like him if there was any chance tfor them to keep alive for the next 15years, they would help restore the discipline, rule of law and also bring back what has been stolen from us by the Juntas.
■ Jonas Tumukunde: Prof. Kanyeyimba is very right. Buganda land Should remain the way its. We have no problem with that.
■ Enock Bahereza: The land question is well answered by Prof. kanyeihamba.
■ Milton Turyareeba (miltonturyareeba@gmail.com): The land question was debated fully by the Consitituent Assembly (CA) in 1994 having consulted the population across the country widely. Mailo land where majority live on especially in Buganda have no problem. If government wants land for any development, adequate compensation should be given to the affected person or organisation and then government owns that land. I don’t think that Mailo land is what brings these massive evictions. Land should remain owned by the people.
■ Ayebare Mellisa (abemanyisa@gmail.com): Its hypocricy to abolish mailo in central Uganda and compensate omugabe/ Barigye in 2000 with over 4bn at the time for less than 100acres (information accurate and verifiable from ULC) in Mbarara, Bushenyi as of 2000 then for what our king had in value for squattered land there. Why cant this be the case in Buganda??
Yasin Ssentamu (0773574085): Mr. Museveni should use rational intelligence not feelings on land issues. I am a Muganda living in Ankole (Bushenyi) where no body, I think can accept their land to belong to the government. I wonder also, what is government? Let the Mailo land issue be put under referendum.
■ Pascal Imarach (0752327092): My father migrated from Teso to Buganda in 1943. I was born in the 70s and we have lived in Buganda as Kibanja holders peacefully until of recent when Government indirectly catalysed land grabbing. Land grabbing was in Bunya, Bugiri district and other parts of Uganda. Is there also Mailo land tenure system? Please, government should instead fight corruption in its systems and leave alone Mailo land. Treat all Ugandans equal and the war should be on corruption.
■ Ambrose Kabogoza (0782372309). I come from Nansana. Gorvenment to abolish mailo land, it needs total changing of Uganda laws.
My view, if Government is to own land, let landlords be left with 25% of their land.

For comments/views, sms 0792735159 or email: newseditor.info@gmail.com

Latest news

error: Content is protected !!